Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

Iowa

DataCentersExposed tracks 20 AI data centers in Iowa — 5 operating and 1 in the pipeline — across 8 counties, drawing 1.8 GW of reported power demand from 6 tracked corporate operators.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

DataCentersExposed tracks 20 data centers in Iowa — 5 operating and 1 proposed. The 6 Iowa facilities with disclosed electrical capacity account for 1.8 GW of demand on the grid — power that competes with homes and businesses for the same generation and transmission.

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
20
data centers
Operating
5
live today
Pipeline
1
proposed / building
Demand
1.8 GW
6 w/ capacity
Counties
8
touched
Operators
6
corporate parents
The story so far

Iowa at a glance

The largest footprint in Iowa belongs to Meta Platforms, Inc., behind 8 tracked facilities. Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corporation, and Apple Inc. round out the most active operators in the state. Many of these sites are filed under shell or project names rather than the parent's — our operator column resolves them back to the real corporate parent wherever the chain is documented.

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Polk County leads Iowa with 15 facilities and a composite risk score of 43/100. Pottawattamie County and Dallas County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

Iowa is not done growing. 1 facility is in the pipeline — proposed, permitted, or under construction — which is where residents still have a say at zoning hearings and in rate cases. Each pending project is a decision about land, water, electricity prices, and tax revenue that hasn't been finalized.

We also surface the accountability trail: 4 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for Iowa below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Who's building

Top operators in Iowa

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
Still contested

Pipeline & proposals

31 of 20 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
Clinton Data CenterProposedClinton
Meta AltoonaMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk540
Google Council BluffsAlphabet Inc.OperatingPolk480
Microsoft West Des MoinesMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Polk360
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Pottawattamie284
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationOperatingDallas106
AppleApple Inc.Mapped (unverified)Dallas
AureonOperatingPolk
CyrusOne OCB1 Council BluffsCyrusOne LLCMapped (unverified)Pottawattamie
Facebook Altoona Data Center 1Meta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
Facebook Altoona Data Center 2Meta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
Facebook Altoona Data Center 3Meta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
Facebook Altoona Data Center 4Meta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
Facebook Altoona Data Center 5Meta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
ForceAmp.comMapped (unverified)Johnson
Gable CORPMapped (unverified)Pottawattamie
Geneseo Communications IncMapped (unverified)Scott
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Pottawattamie
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Pottawattamie
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Pottawattamie
GoogleAlphabet Inc.Mapped (unverified)Pottawattamie
Google Cedar RapidsGoogle LLCMapped (unverified)Linn
Lightedge Des Moines 1OperatingPolk
Lightedge Des Moines 2OperatingPolk
MetaMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
MetaMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Polk
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Warren
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Polk
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Dallas
MicrosoftMicrosoft CorporationMapped (unverified)Polk
Osmium Data CenterMapped (unverified)Madison County

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.