Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
Ranking

Thirstiest facilities

Highest vetted water use (gallons/day) — company sustainability disclosures (high confidence) and our derived figure from state withdrawal reporting. Modeled estimates and unvetted legacy-intake joins are excluded, so this matches each facility page.

  1. 1
    Google Council Bluffs2,685,205 gpd
  2. 2
    US Bitcoin2,386,000 gpd
  3. 3
    Google Mayes County Data Center (Pryor)2,233,151 gpd
  4. 4
    Google2,091,507 gpd
  5. 5
    Google Douglas County946,849 gpd
  6. 6
    Google Lenoir922,740 gpd
  7. 7
    Google Data Center The Dalles Oregon828,493 gpd
  8. 8
    Google790,685 gpd
  9. 9
    QTS Manassas 1538,340 gpd
  10. 10
    Minnesota Gateway Data Center512,689 gpd
  11. 11
    Google Henderson (proposed)435,068 gpd
  12. 12
    Google389,589 gpd
  13. 13
    Flexential Minneapolis - Chaska386,205 gpd
  14. 14
    Google Midlothian372,055 gpd
  15. 15
    Google Papillion369,041 gpd
  16. 16
    Google New Albany348,219 gpd
  17. 17
    COPT Data Center Bldg 298,058 gpd
  18. 18
    Google Lockbourne, OH63,836 gpd
  19. 19
    COPT Innovation Park Data Center52,249 gpd
  20. 20
    H5 Data Centers Ashburn46,110 gpd
  21. 21
    Amazon Web Services37,811 gpd
  22. 22
    Greenidge Power Plant and Data Center37,189 gpd
  23. 23
    PowerHouse ABX-125,178 gpd
  24. 24
    Google Lancaster21,096 gpd
  25. 25
    Amazon IAD7614,063 gpd

Methodology & sources

Rankings reflect what's currently in our database. Capacity-based boards include only facilities with a reported or estimated megawattage. Risk scores weight project exposure, power, water, and land.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.