Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

New York

DataCentersExposed tracks 23 AI data centers in New York — 7 operating and 1 in the pipeline — across 13 counties, drawing 287 MW of reported power demand from 5 tracked corporate operators.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

DataCentersExposed tracks 23 data centers in New York — 7 operating and 1 proposed. The 5 New York facilities with disclosed electrical capacity account for 287 MW of demand on the grid — power that competes with homes and businesses for the same generation and transmission.

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
23
data centers
Operating
7
live today
Pipeline
1
proposed / building
Demand
287 MW
5 w/ capacity
Counties
13
touched
Operators
5
corporate parents
The story so far

New York at a glance

The largest footprint in New York belongs to Blockfusion USA Inc., behind 2 tracked facilities. Digital Realty Trust, Inc., Prime Data Centers, and DataBank Holdings, Ltd. round out the most active operators in the state. Many of these sites are filed under shell or project names rather than the parent's — our operator column resolves them back to the real corporate parent wherever the chain is documented.

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Niagara County leads New York with 5 facilities and a composite risk score of 15/100. New York County and Albany County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

New York is not done growing. 1 facility is in the pipeline — proposed, permitted, or under construction — which is where residents still have a say at zoning hearings and in rate cases. Each pending project is a decision about land, water, electricity prices, and tax revenue that hasn't been finalized.

We also surface the accountability trail: 8 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for New York below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Data-center policy watch: New York's legislature passed the Responsible Data Center Development Act in June 2026 — a first-in-the-nation one-year pause on new permits for data centers of 20 MW or more — and it awaits the governor's decision.

Who's building

Top operators in New York

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
Still contested

Pipeline & proposals

25 of 23 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
DigiHost North Tonawanda AI Data CenterProposedNiagara123
Fluidstack Lake MarinerMapped (unverified)Niagara117
32 Avenue of the AmericasMapped (unverified)New York
33 Thomas StreetOperatingNew York
BlockfusionBlockfusion USA Inc.Mapped (unverified)Niagara
Blockfusion Niagra FallsBlockfusion USA Inc.Mapped (unverified)Niagara
Bloomberg Data CenterPrime Data CentersMapped (unverified)Rockland
Cable & Wireless Cable Landing StationMapped (unverified)Suffolk
Databank LGA3DataBank Holdings, Ltd.OperatingRockland
DatavergeOperatingKings
Digital Realty New York JFK12Digital Realty Trust, Inc.OperatingNew York
Digital Realty New York JFK13Digital Realty Trust, Inc.OperatingNew York
Frontier ScienceMapped (unverified)Erie
Greenidge Power Plant and Data CenterMapped (unverified)Yates
IBM BuildingMapped (unverified)Albany
IBM Quantum Data CenterMapped (unverified)Dutchess
Lumen Albany 4Lumen Technologies, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Albany
Merrill Lynch Data CenterMapped (unverified)Richmond
NYGC ChateaugayMapped (unverified)Franklin
Old MainMapped (unverified)St. Lawrence
SU Green Data CenterPrime Data CentersMapped (unverified)Onondaga
Telehouse TeleportOperatingRichmond
Turnkey InternetOperatingAlbany
US BitcoinMapped (unverified)Niagara
fifteenfortyseven CSR ORNY1OperatingRockland

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.