Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

Idaho

DataCentersExposed tracks 3 AI data centers in Idaho — 0 operating and 0 in the pipeline — across 3 counties, drawing 198 MW of reported power demand from 1 tracked corporate operator.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

DataCentersExposed tracks 3 data centers in Idaho. The 1 Idaho facilities with disclosed electrical capacity account for 198 MW of demand on the grid — power that competes with homes and businesses for the same generation and transmission.

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
3
data centers
Operating
0
live today
Pipeline
0
proposed / building
Demand
198 MW
1 w/ capacity
Counties
3
touched
Operators
1
corporate parents
The story so far

Idaho at a glance

The largest footprint in Idaho belongs to Meta Platforms, Inc., behind 1 tracked facility. Many of these sites are filed under shell or project names rather than the parent's — our operator column resolves them back to the real corporate parent wherever the chain is documented.

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Bear Lake County leads Idaho with 1 facility and a composite risk score of 4/100. Madison County and Ada County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

We also surface the accountability trail: 3 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for Idaho below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Who's building

Top operators in Idaho

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
CountyFacilitiesPipelineRisk
Bear Lake County14
Madison County14
Ada County1
3 of 3 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
Meta KunaMeta Platforms, Inc.Mapped (unverified)Ada198
Family History CenterMapped (unverified)Bear Lake
VentureDataMapped (unverified)Madison

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.