Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Fairfax County, Virginia

DataCentersExposed tracks 14 AI data centers in Fairfax County, Virginia — 12 operating and 0 in the pipeline, led by Amazon.com, Inc.. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Fairfax County, Virginia has 14 tracked data centers, 12 of them operating. Its composite data-center risk score is 20 out of 100 — see the breakdown above for which factors drive it.

Facilities
14
Operating
12
Pipeline
0

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
20Low
  • Project exposure · 35
  • Power demand · 0
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Fairfax County

Amazon.com, Inc. has the largest presence in Fairfax County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

14 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
8100 Boone BoulevardDigital Realty Trust, Inc.Operating
Amazon IAD-1
Chantilly
Amazon.com, Inc.Operating
Amazon IAD-165
Herndon
Amazon.com, Inc.Operating
Amazon IAD-500
Herndon
Amazon.com, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
CoreSite Reston Campus VA1
Reston
American Tower CorporationOperating
CoreSite Reston VA3
Reston
American Tower CorporationOperating
DataBank McLean IAD2
McLean
DataBank Holdings, Ltd.Operating
Digital RealtyDigital Realty Trust, Inc.Operating
Element Critical VA1Element CriticalOperating
Equinix DC7Equinix, Inc.Operating
Equinix DC97Equinix, Inc.Operating
Iad1
Reston
Operating
Menlo Digital MD-DC1Mapped (unverified)
Va3
Reston
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.Operating
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Fairfax County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.