Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Middlesex County, New Jersey

DataCentersExposed tracks 9 AI data centers in Middlesex County, New Jersey — 3 operating and 0 in the pipeline, led by Digital Realty Trust, Inc.. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Middlesex County, New Jersey has 9 tracked data centers, 3 of them operating. Its composite data-center risk score is 14 out of 100 — see the breakdown above for which factors drive it.

Facilities
9
Operating
3
Pipeline
0

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
14Low
  • Project exposure · 24
  • Power demand · 0
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Middlesex County

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. has the largest presence in Middlesex County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

9 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Barclays DatacenterMapped (unverified)
DataBank Piscataway EWR2DataBank Holdings, Ltd.Operating
Digital Realty New York EWR11
Piscataway Township
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.Operating
EquinixEquinix, Inc.Mapped (unverified)
IO Datacenter
Edison
Compass Datacenters, LLCMapped (unverified)
Open Data Centers PiscatawayPrime Data CentersMapped (unverified)
OptimumMapped (unverified)
QTS Piscataway Data Center
Piscataway
QTS Realty Trust, LLCOperating
Verizon Wireline Network BuildingVerizon Communications Inc.Mapped (unverified)
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Middlesex County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.