Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
U.S. data-center footprint

New Hampshire

DataCentersExposed tracks 3 AI data centers in New Hampshire — 0 operating and 0 in the pipeline — across 2 counties, drawing 0 MW of reported power demand from 0 tracked corporate operators.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

DataCentersExposed tracks 3 data centers in New Hampshire. Capacity figures are still being sourced for New Hampshire; where a facility's megawattage is on the public record, it appears on that facility's page.

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Tracked
3
data centers
Operating
0
live today
Pipeline
0
proposed / building
Demand
0 MW
0 w/ capacity
Counties
2
touched
Operators
0
corporate parents
The story so far

New Hampshire at a glance

Geographically, the buildout clusters: Rockingham County leads New Hampshire with 2 facilities and a composite risk score of 6/100. Strafford County follow. Our county risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%); the full breakdown is shown on each county page.

We also surface the accountability trail: 2 state bills mentioning data centers and 6 recent news items are tracked for New Hampshire below, pulled from LegiScan and GDELT and refreshed automatically. Legislation is linked to the counties and operators it names; news is classified by community sentiment.

Where it's concentrated

County risk leaderboard

Risk methodology
CountyFacilitiesPipelineRisk
Rockingham County26
Strafford County14
3 of 3 shown

All tracked facilities

FacilityOperatorStatusCountyMW
FirstLightMapped (unverified)Rockingham
Information Technology Data CenterMapped (unverified)Rockingham
UNH Durham Data CenterMapped (unverified)Strafford

Methodology & sources

Facility counts include operating, under-construction, proposed, and permitted sites. Capacity (MW) combines operator disclosures, interconnection-queue estimates, and research datasets; see each facility for provenance. County risk scores weight project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%), renormalized over measured factors.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.