Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
ultimate parent

Iron Mountain Incorporated

DataCentersExposed tracks 10 data centers operated by Iron Mountain Incorporated across 4 states. Iron Mountain Incorporated has filed or built under 5 project codenames resolved here, including Project Matterhorn, Virginia 3, Virginia 4 and 5.

Sources: SEC EDGAR, GLEIF LEI

Reporting by

Facilities
10
tracked
States
4
footprint
Pipeline
0
proposed / building
Reported power
Codename decoder

Project codenames & aliases

Names this operator has filed or built under. We resolve them back to Iron Mountain Incorporated so a search for the codename finds the real company.

  • Project Matterhorn
  • Virginia 3
  • Virginia 4 and 5
  • Virginia 6
  • Virginia 7
10 facilities

Where Iron Mountain Incorporated builds

FacilityLocationStatusMW
Iron MountainMapped (unverified)
Iron MountainWAMapped (unverified)
Iron Mountain AMS1Mapped (unverified)
Iron Mountain AZP-1Phoenix, AZOperating
Iron Mountain Data & Record StorageChicago, ILMapped (unverified)
Iron Mountain Data Centers AZS-1AZOperating
Iron Mountain FRA-1Frankfurt am MainMapped (unverified)
Iron Mountain FRA-2Frankfurt am MainMapped (unverified)
Iron Mountain VA-3VAMapped (unverified)
Iron Mountain VA-6Manassas, VAOperating
Federal lobbying

Lobbying Washington

via Senate LDA
Reported spend
$990K
2022
Filings
4
on data-center / energy issues
PeriodLobbyist / firmIssuesAmount
2022
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
GovernmentComputers / internet
$310Kfiling
2022
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
GovernmentComputers / internet
$230Kfiling
2022
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
GovernmentComputers / internet
$230Kfiling
2022
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
GovernmentComputers / internet
$220Kfiling

Amounts are each filing's total reported lobbying by Iron Mountain Incorporated (or firms it retained) for quarters in which data-center, energy, water, or tax issues were lobbied — not a data-center-only figure. Source: U.S. Senate Office of Public Records.

Methodology & sources

Corporate parent chains and project codenames are resolved from SEC filings, state incorporation records, and permit documents. Each link carries a confidence level; low-confidence inferences are labeled.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.