Skip to content
DataCentersExposed
County data-center profile

Minnehaha County, South Dakota

DataCentersExposed tracks 3 AI data centers in Minnehaha County, South Dakota — 1 operating and 1 in the pipeline, drawing 720 MW of reported power demand, led by Microsoft Corporation. Its transparent data-center risk score is 0/100.

Sources: Methodology, Coverage scorecard

Minnehaha County, South Dakota has 3 tracked data centers, 1 of them operating and 1 in the development pipeline. Its composite data-center risk score is 25 out of 100 — see the breakdown above for which factors drive it.

Facilities
3
Operating
1
Pipeline
1

Reporting by · Updated May 29, 2026

Risk breakdown
25Low
  • Project exposure · 14
  • Power demand · 40
  • Water draw · n/a
  • Land footprint · n/a
Overview

What's happening in Minnehaha County

Facilities here with disclosed capacity draw 720 MW from the local grid. Data-center load on this scale is the single biggest driver of recent capacity-market price increases — costs that flow through to every ratepayer in the service territory, not just the operators.

Microsoft Corporation has the largest presence in Minnehaha County. We resolve project codenames and shell LLCs back to the corporate parent wherever the public record allows, so the table below names who is actually behind each site.

Below: every tracked facility in the county, the active state legislation that names it or its county, and local news. Commissioner vote records arrive in a later release; the placeholders show where that accountability data will land.

3 facilities

Every tracked facility

FacilityOperatorStatusMW
Microsoft Sioux Falls (proposed)
Sioux Falls
Microsoft CorporationProposed720
ADP South DakotaMapped (unverified)
TierPoint Sioux Falls West Data Center
Sioux Falls
TierPoint, LLCOperating
Accountability

County commissioners

How the Minnehaha County board votes on each data-center matter — the rezonings, the abatements, the water permits — is built from public-meeting minutes and roll-call records. Know of a vote we should be tracking? Tell us.

Methodology & sources

The risk score weights project exposure (40%), power demand (30%), water draw (15%), and land footprint (15%). Water and land are not yet measured for our facilities, so those arcs render as "not yet measured" and the weights are renormalized over the factors we can source today — when the data lands, the score updates.

Every row carries a confidence level (high / medium / low) and a source URL. Spot an error? Tell us.